# How Sully compares

> Sully is the AI scribe for site walks. Walk the site as you always do, shooting video or photos and talking as you go. Sully reads the footage with what you said and hands back a summary with action items, every line cited to its frame. You turn the draft into the report, schedule or quote, and you sign it. It lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive, Gmail or Google Drive. Made by Hey Sully in Australia; in early access now. Below, how it compares with the tools people ask about, row by row, checked against each product's own documentation on the date shown. Human-readable version: https://heysully.ai/compare

Marks: **Yes** · **Partly** · **No** · **Not published** — "Not published" means the product's own material doesn't say, and we don't guess. Bracketed numbers point to the notes under each table.

## Sully vs SafetyCulture (Mitti)

Canonical: https://heysully.ai/compare/sully-vs-safetyculture
Last checked: 31 Aug 2026 (2026-08-31)

**Verdict.** Sully is the SafetyCulture alternative for firms that visit sites they don’t run and owe a client the write-up: it reads the walkthrough video and what you said, instead of filling a form.

### What is SafetyCulture (Mitti)?

SafetyCulture, renamed Mitti in August 2026, is the operations platform that grew out of iAuditor: checklists, inspections, issues, training and sensors for teams running their own sites, with an AI Assistant on every plan.

### Sully vs SafetyCulture (Mitti) comparison

| Feature | Sully | SafetyCulture (Mitti) |
|---|---|---|
| **Company** | | |
| Made by | Hey Sully, Australia | SafetyCulture (Mitti), Australia |
| Pricing from | A$49 a month · free trial, no card | Free · Premium US$24 a seat a month [1] |
| Status | Early access | Shipping, at scale |
| **Capture on site** | | |
| Video walkthrough | **Yes** | **Partly** [2] |
| Photos | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Talk as you go | **Yes** | **Partly** [3] |
| Works offline, hands-free | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| No platform to adopt | **Yes** | **No** |
| **The AI** | | |
| Reads the video together with what you said | **Yes** | **No** [4] |
| Free-form summary, not a fixed form | **Yes** | **Partly** [5] |
| Every line cited to its frame and words | **Yes** | **No** |
| Drafts the report, schedule or quote | **Yes** [6] | **Partly** [7] |
| Ask questions across walks and projects | **Yes** [8] | **Yes** [9] |
| Lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive | **Yes** | **No** |
| **The record** | | |
| Kept if you stop paying | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Compare baseline and post-works walks | **Yes** [10] | **No** |
| Search by what was said on site | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| **Trust** | | |
| The AI drafts; you review and sign | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Drafted vs verified, on the record | **Yes** [11] | **No** [12] |
| Australian data residency | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Microsoft 365 sign-in | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Never trains models on your data | **Yes** | **Yes** [13] |

Notes:

1. SafetyCulture: Annual billing; US$29 monthly. Australian customers are billed in AUD at a rate the page doesn’t publish. AI is credit-metered on every plan.
2. SafetyCulture: Videos attach as evidence, capped at 3 minutes or 1.5 GB; iOS trims longer clips.
3. SafetyCulture: A voice note per issue, not a walk.
4. SafetyCulture: Their help centre, under “Limitations”: “AI generates details from photos, voice recordings, and text descriptions. You can still upload videos as evidence, but the AI won’t analyze them.”
5. SafetyCulture: The AI Assistant generates documents from a prompt, but they “only exist within the current conversation.” Inspections are template-driven.
6. Sully: Team plans and up draft them straight from the record.
7. SafetyCulture: Prompt-generated documents “can only be downloaded to your device”, not saved to Mitti, SharePoint or Google Drive.
8. Sully: Any walk or project on Solo; the whole workspace on Team and up.
9. SafetyCulture: The AI Assistant answers over your organisation’s data.
10. Sully: Firm plans.
11. Sully: Drafted lines stay marked until a person verifies them.
12. SafetyCulture: Nothing marks AI-generated lines against verified ones.
13. SafetyCulture: Their AI page: contracts with sub-processors “explicitly prohibit the use of customer data to train their models.”

### Which is right for you?

Sully is built for people who visit sites they don’t own (surveyors, architects, fire-safety practitioners, inspectors, trades) and owe a client a write-up afterwards.

Mitti is built for organisations that run their own sites: checklists, incidents, training, sensors and, now, insurance.

Choose Mitti if your write-up is an inspection form and you want one operations system for everything on your sites.

Choose Sully if your evidence is a narrated walk of someone else’s site, the deliverable is a report or quote in your firm’s shape, and you want the draft in Teams or Outlook rather than inside a platform.

### FAQs

**Is Sully a SafetyCulture alternative?**

For the write-up, yes. Not for the rest of the platform: checklists, incidents, training, sensors, insurance. If that is the job, Mitti is the better fit.

**Can SafetyCulture (Mitti) analyse a walkthrough video?**

Not by its own documentation: uploaded videos are kept as evidence “but the AI won’t analyze them.” We re-check that page and will update this one if it changes.

**Is Mitti the same product as SafetyCulture?**

Yes. SafetyCulture rebranded to Mitti on 11 August 2026, “a new name for the same platform” per its launch site.

### Sources checked

- [Mitti help centre — “Report issues using AI” (Limitations)](https://help.mitti.com/006682)
- [Mitti help centre — “Upload files and generate documents with the AI Assistant”](https://help.mitti.com/006886)
- [Mitti help centre — “Supported files and sizes”](https://help.mitti.com/002801)
- [Mitti help centre — “AI in SafetyCulture”](https://help.mitti.com/003943)
- [Mitti pricing](https://mitti.com/pricing)
- [SafetyCulture is becoming Mitti — rebrand site](https://brand.mitti.com)

### Longer reads from Sully

- [The narration is the walk](https://heysully.ai/thinking/the-narration-is-the-walk)
- [The site record appreciates](https://heysully.ai/thinking/the-site-record-appreciates)

---

## Sully vs Sitemate Storm

Canonical: https://heysully.ai/compare/sully-vs-sitemate-storm
Last checked: 11 Aug 2026 (2026-08-11)

**Verdict.** Sully is the Sitemate Storm alternative for firms whose write-up is a report or quote rather than a form: it reads the narrated walkthrough video and drafts the summary, with no platform to move into.

### What is Sitemate Storm?

Storm is the AI agent inside Sitemate’s Dashpivot, the Australian construction forms and records platform: it fills any open form from voice notes, photos and typed notes, at no extra cost on every plan.

### Sully vs Sitemate Storm comparison

| Feature | Sully | Sitemate Storm |
|---|---|---|
| **Company** | | |
| Made by | Hey Sully, Australia | Sitemate, Australia |
| Pricing from | A$49 a month · free trial, no card | Dashpivot A$32 a contributor a month · Storm included [1] |
| Status | Early access | Shipping (Storm 1.0, May 2026) |
| **Capture on site** | | |
| Video walkthrough | **Yes** | **No** [2] |
| Photos | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Talk as you go | **Yes** | **Yes** [3] |
| Works offline, hands-free | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| No platform to adopt | **Yes** | **No** [4] |
| **The AI** | | |
| Reads the video together with what you said | **Yes** | **No** |
| Free-form summary, not a fixed form | **Yes** | **No** [5] |
| Every line cited to its frame and words | **Yes** | **Partly** [6] |
| Drafts the report, schedule or quote | **Yes** [7] | **Partly** [8] |
| Ask questions across walks and projects | **Yes** [9] | **Partly** [10] |
| Lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive | **Yes** | **Partly** [11] |
| **The record** | | |
| Kept if you stop paying | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Compare baseline and post-works walks | **Yes** [12] | **No** |
| Search by what was said on site | **Yes** | **Partly** [13] |
| **Trust** | | |
| The AI drafts; you review and sign | **Yes** | **Yes** [14] |
| Drafted vs verified, on the record | **Yes** [15] | **Partly** |
| Australian data residency | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Microsoft 365 sign-in | **Yes** | **Yes** [16] |
| Never trains models on your data | **Yes** | **Not published** |

Notes:

1. Sitemate Storm: Standard plan, monthly term, smallest volume tier; up to A$98 on Platinum. Storm is “available across all Dashpivot plans … at no additional cost.”
2. Sitemate Storm: Storm’s “What can Storm do today?” FAQ lists “voice notes, photos, typed notes, captured weather, and captured location.” One marketing bullet claims video; every capability list omits it, unchanged 16 July to 11 August 2026.
3. Sitemate Storm: Voice notes and hands-free dictation into a form.
4. Sitemate Storm: Storm “is not a separate product” and “operates inside the Dashpivot web app and Dashpivot Mobile App.”
5. Sitemate Storm: Every output is a completed form, a template or a structured record: “50-point check to do? Just let Storm listen as you go, drop in your photos.”
6. Sitemate Storm: Storm “flags low-confidence fields for review rather than guessing.” That traces to a field, not a moment.
7. Sully: Team plans and up draft them straight from the record.
8. Sitemate Storm: Completed forms, exported to PDF, Word, Excel or PowerPoint.
9. Sully: Any walk or project on Solo; the whole workspace on Team and up.
10. Sitemate Storm: No chat of its own; data is exposed to Claude, ChatGPT and Copilot through the Sitemate MCP.
11. Sitemate Storm: Microsoft 365 integrations: SharePoint, Dataverse, Power BI, OneDrive.
12. Sully: Firm plans.
13. Sitemate Storm: Structured records are queryable by field, not by what was said.
14. Sitemate Storm: “No record is committed without a qualified person signing off.”
15. Sully: Drafted lines stay marked until a person verifies them.
16. Sitemate Storm: From the Dashpivot Pro plan.

### Which is right for you?

Sully is built for people who visit sites they don’t own (surveyors, architects, fire-safety practitioners, inspectors, trades) and owe a client a write-up afterwards.

Storm is built for contractors running a job site through Dashpivot forms, permits and records; the site is theirs for the life of the project.

Choose Storm if you already run Dashpivot and your write-up is a form you want filled from voice and photos, at no extra cost.

Choose Sully if the deliverable is a report, schedule or quote in your own shape, your capture is a narrated walkthrough video, and you don’t want a platform between the walk and Outlook.

### FAQs

**Does Sitemate Storm process video?**

Not by its own capability lists as of 11 August 2026: voice notes, photos, typed notes, weather and location. A marketing bullet mentions video; the functional descriptions don’t. We re-check the page and will update this one if that changes.

**Is Sully a Sitemate alternative?**

Only for the write-up. A contractor running a project in Dashpivot wouldn’t swap it for Sully; a surveying firm wouldn’t adopt Dashpivot to get a report drafted.

**Does Storm cost extra?**

No. Per Sitemate, Storm is “available across all Dashpivot plans, including free trials, at no additional cost.” The cost is the Dashpivot licence.

### Sources checked

- [Storm product page — Sitemate](https://sitemate.com/agents/storm/)
- [“Sending Sitemate Into The AI Era — Introducing Storm 1.0” — Hartley Pike, CEO](https://sitemate.com/au/blog/company/introducing-storm-1-0/)
- [Dashpivot pricing — Sitemate](https://sitemate.com/software/dashpivot/pricing/)

### Longer reads from Sully

- [The narration is the walk](https://heysully.ai/thinking/the-narration-is-the-walk)
- [The checklist is not the job](https://heysully.ai/blog/the-checklist-is-not-the-job)

---

## Sully vs ChatGPT

Canonical: https://heysully.ai/compare/sully-vs-chatgpt
Last checked: 31 Aug 2026 (2026-08-31)

**Verdict.** Sully is the ChatGPT alternative for site walks: it was there for the walk, reads the video with what you said, and cites every line, instead of reformatting the notes you typed up afterwards.

### What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is OpenAI’s general assistant: a chat you type or talk into that reads the photos and files you give it and writes almost anything back. Plenty of inspectors already use it to tidy site notes into a report.

### Sully vs ChatGPT comparison

| Feature | Sully | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| **Company** | | |
| Made by | Hey Sully, Australia | OpenAI, United States |
| Pricing from | A$49 a month · free trial, no card | Free · paid individual and team plans |
| Status | Early access | Shipping, everywhere |
| **Capture on site** | | |
| Video walkthrough | **Yes** | **No** [1] |
| Photos | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Talk as you go | **Yes** | **Partly** [2] |
| Works offline, hands-free | **Yes** | **No** |
| No platform to adopt | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| **The AI** | | |
| Reads the video together with what you said | **Yes** | **No** [3] |
| Free-form summary, not a fixed form | **Yes** | **Yes** [4] |
| Every line cited to its frame and words | **Yes** | **No** [5] |
| Drafts the report, schedule or quote | **Yes** [6] | **Partly** [7] |
| Ask questions across walks and projects | **Yes** [8] | **No** [9] |
| Lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive | **Yes** | **No** [10] |
| **The record** | | |
| Kept if you stop paying | **Yes** | **No** [11] |
| Compare baseline and post-works walks | **Yes** [12] | **No** |
| Search by what was said on site | **Yes** | **No** |
| **Trust** | | |
| The AI drafts; you review and sign | **Yes** | **Partly** [13] |
| Drafted vs verified, on the record | **Yes** [14] | **No** |
| Australian data residency | **Yes** | **No** |
| Microsoft 365 sign-in | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Never trains models on your data | **Yes** | **Partly** [15] |

Notes:

1. ChatGPT: No capture app; you bring photos and files to a chat.
2. ChatGPT: Voice mode, one conversation at a time.
3. ChatGPT: A twenty-minute walkthrough with narration over it isn’t what a chat is built to read.
4. ChatGPT: Anything, in any shape. We make no claim to beat it at prose.
5. ChatGPT: You check the draft against the camera roll yourself.
6. Sully: Team plans and up draft them straight from the record.
7. ChatGPT: From the notes you typed, so only as complete as what you remembered.
8. Sully: Any walk or project on Solo; the whole workspace on Team and up.
9. ChatGPT: No record of walks to ask.
10. ChatGPT: You copy it out.
11. ChatGPT: Conversations belong to whoever typed them; there is no firm record by site and date.
12. Sully: Firm plans.
13. ChatGPT: You’re the author, but nothing marks what the model wrote.
14. Sully: Drafted lines stay marked until a person verifies them.
15. ChatGPT: Consumer plans have a setting governing whether conversations improve OpenAI’s models; business plans differ. Check the plan your firm is on.

### Which is right for you?

Sully is built for people who visit sites they don’t own (surveyors, architects, fire-safety practitioners, inspectors, trades) and owe a client a write-up afterwards.

ChatGPT is built for everyone and for anything. It starts after you have reconstructed the walk into notes.

Choose ChatGPT if your site notes are already good and typed, the job needs no record beyond the report, and you want one assistant for everything else too.

Choose Sully if you would rather talk through the walk than type it up afterwards, every line has to trace back to the frame for a client or a tribunal, and you want the firm’s walks in one record.

### FAQs

**Can I use ChatGPT to write a condition (dilapidation) report?**

You can draft one from your notes and photos, and many do. The catch: the draft is only as good as the notes, producing them is most of the work, and nothing is cited to the evidence. Sully removes the note-taking and cites every line. You still write and sign the report.

**Does Sully use ChatGPT under the hood?**

Sully uses foundation models from major providers, chosen per task. Your walks are never used to train any model, and every walk is workspace-isolated and hosted in Australia. What differs is what the model is given: the whole narrated walk.

**Is Sully just a wrapper around a chatbot?**

No. The hard part is getting the walk into evidence that can be reasoned over and cited, not the prose. Sully is a capture app, a record and a scribe. Chat is one way of asking the record a question.

### Sources checked

- [ChatGPT pricing — OpenAI](https://openai.com/chatgpt/pricing/)
- [Privacy policy — OpenAI](https://openai.com/policies/privacy-policy/)

### Longer reads from Sully

- [The scribe pattern](https://heysully.ai/thinking/the-scribe-pattern)
- [Questions to ask before AI touches a report you sign](https://heysully.ai/blog/questions-to-ask-before-ai-touches-a-report-you-sign)

---

## Sully vs Microsoft Copilot

Canonical: https://heysully.ai/compare/sully-vs-microsoft-copilot
Last checked: 31 Aug 2026 (2026-08-31)

**Verdict.** Sully is the Microsoft Copilot alternative for site walks: Copilot can’t index your walkthrough videos and reads one recording’s transcript at a time; Sully reads the walk and lands the cited draft in Teams and OneDrive anyway.

### What is Microsoft Copilot?

Microsoft 365 Copilot is the assistant inside Word, Excel, Outlook, Teams and SharePoint, grounded in your tenant’s documents. Most firms we talk to already pay for it, so “can’t we just use Copilot?” deserves a precise answer.

### Sully vs Microsoft Copilot comparison

| Feature | Sully | Microsoft Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| **Company** | | |
| Made by | Hey Sully, Australia | Microsoft, United States |
| Pricing from | A$49 a month · free trial, no card | Per-user add-on to Microsoft 365 |
| Status | Early access | Shipping |
| **Capture on site** | | |
| Video walkthrough | **Yes** | **No** [1] |
| Photos | **Yes** | **No** |
| Talk as you go | **Yes** | **No** |
| Works offline, hands-free | **Yes** | **No** |
| No platform to adopt | **Yes** | **Yes** [2] |
| **The AI** | | |
| Reads the video together with what you said | **Yes** | **No** [3] |
| Free-form summary, not a fixed form | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Every line cited to its frame and words | **Yes** | **Partly** [4] |
| Drafts the report, schedule or quote | **Yes** [5] | **Partly** [6] |
| Ask questions across walks and projects | **Yes** [7] | **Partly** [8] |
| Lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive | **Yes** | **Yes** [9] |
| **The record** | | |
| Kept if you stop paying | **Yes** | **Partly** [10] |
| Compare baseline and post-works walks | **Yes** [11] | **No** |
| Search by what was said on site | **Yes** | **No** [12] |
| **Trust** | | |
| The AI drafts; you review and sign | **Yes** | **Partly** |
| Drafted vs verified, on the record | **Yes** [13] | **No** [14] |
| Australian data residency | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| Microsoft 365 sign-in | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Never trains models on your data | **Yes** | **Yes** [15] |

Notes:

1. Microsoft Copilot: No capture of its own; site videos sit in OneDrive or SharePoint as files.
2. Microsoft Copilot: It is the tools you already use.
3. Microsoft Copilot: Microsoft’s own doc: the Copilot semantic index is “generated from text-based SharePoint Online files”: Word, PowerPoint, PDF, OneNote, mail, with no video or audio row (reviewed 23 April 2026). Copilot in the Clipchamp player reads the transcript of the one video you have open.
4. Microsoft Copilot: Cites documents, and transcript timestamps in the video player, not a frame and its words at once.
5. Sully: Team plans and up draft them straight from the record.
6. Microsoft Copilot: Excellent at the report once the findings are typed.
7. Sully: Any walk or project on Solo; the whole workspace on Team and up.
8. Microsoft Copilot: Across documents, not videos.
9. Microsoft Copilot: It is Word, Outlook and Teams.
10. Microsoft Copilot: Files in your tenant, not a walk record.
11. Sully: Firm plans.
12. Microsoft Copilot: Video isn’t indexed.
13. Sully: Drafted lines stay marked until a person verifies them.
14. Microsoft Copilot: Track changes, but nothing marks drafted against verified.
15. Microsoft Copilot: Microsoft: prompts, responses and Graph data “aren’t used to train foundation LLMs.”

### Which is right for you?

Sully is built for people who visit sites they don’t own (surveyors, architects, fire-safety practitioners, inspectors, trades) and owe a client a write-up afterwards.

Copilot is built for everyone in a Microsoft 365 tenant, for documents, mail and meetings, and it is good at the report once the facts are in it.

Choose Copilot if your site work is a few photos and typed findings, the report is already a Word job, and your IT team won’t add a tool this year.

Choose Sully if the evidence is a walkthrough video Copilot can’t index, you want to ask across every walk on a project, and you want a cited draft that still lands in Teams and OneDrive. Most firms run both.

### FAQs

**Can Microsoft Copilot summarise a site walkthrough video?**

One at a time, from its transcript. Copilot in the Clipchamp player summarises the Teams recording or Clipchamp video you have open. It doesn’t reason over the footage, and can’t answer across several videos.

**Does Copilot index videos stored in SharePoint?**

Not as of Microsoft’s documentation reviewed 23 April 2026: the index is “generated from text-based SharePoint Online files,” with no video or audio type listed. Microsoft says more types will follow; we re-check and will update this page.

**Does Sully work with Microsoft 365?**

Yes, by design: Microsoft sign-in (Entra ID), delivery into Teams, Outlook and OneDrive, and tenant auto-join on Firm plans. Hosted in Australia; every walk workspace-isolated.

### Sources checked

- [Semantic index for Microsoft 365 Copilot — Microsoft Learn](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftsearch/semantic-index-for-copilot)
- [Frequently asked questions about Copilot in the Clipchamp video player — Microsoft Support](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/clipchamp/frequently-asked-questions-about-copilot-in-the-clipchamp-video-player)
- [Data, privacy, and security for Microsoft 365 Copilot — Microsoft Learn](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/copilot/microsoft-365/microsoft-365-copilot-privacy)
- [Microsoft 365 Copilot](https://www.microsoft.com/en-au/microsoft-365/copilot)

### Longer reads from Sully

- [The site record appreciates](https://heysully.ai/thinking/the-site-record-appreciates)
- [AI for firms that sign their work](https://heysully.ai/thinking/ai-for-firms-that-sign-their-work)

---

## Sully vs Property Inspect

Canonical: https://heysully.ai/compare/sully-vs-property-inspect
Last checked: 31 Aug 2026 (2026-08-31)

**Verdict.** Sully is the Property Inspect alternative for firms that visit sites they don’t manage: a free-form, cited summary from a narrated walk, not a room-by-room template, with the record kept on every plan.

### What is Property Inspect?

Property Inspect is inspection software for property and facility teams managing a portfolio: templates, scheduled inspections, client logins, and InspectAI, which describes photos and drafts report content with human sign-off.

### Sully vs Property Inspect comparison

| Feature | Sully | Property Inspect |
|---|---|---|
| **Company** | | |
| Made by | Hey Sully, Australia | Property Inspect, sold internationally |
| Pricing from | A$49 a month · free trial, no card | A$69 a month (Solo, annual) [1] |
| Status | Early access | Shipping; InspectAI marketed as new |
| **Capture on site** | | |
| Video walkthrough | **Yes** | **No** [2] |
| Photos | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Talk as you go | **Yes** | **Partly** [3] |
| Works offline, hands-free | **Yes** | **Yes** [4] |
| No platform to adopt | **Yes** | **No** |
| **The AI** | | |
| Reads the video together with what you said | **Yes** | **No** |
| Free-form summary, not a fixed form | **Yes** | **No** [5] |
| Every line cited to its frame and words | **Yes** | **Partly** [6] |
| Drafts the report, schedule or quote | **Yes** [7] | **Partly** [8] |
| Ask questions across walks and projects | **Yes** [9] | **No** [10] |
| Lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive | **Yes** | **No** [11] |
| **The record** | | |
| Kept if you stop paying | **Yes** | **Partly** [12] |
| Compare baseline and post-works walks | **Yes** [13] | **Partly** [14] |
| Search by what was said on site | **Yes** | **Not published** |
| **Trust** | | |
| The AI drafts; you review and sign | **Yes** | **Yes** [15] |
| Drafted vs verified, on the record | **Yes** [16] | **Yes** [17] |
| Australian data residency | **Yes** | **Partly** [18] |
| Microsoft 365 sign-in | **Yes** | **Partly** [19] |
| Never trains models on your data | **Yes** | **Not published** |

Notes:

1. Property Inspect: A$82.80 monthly; Standard A$100 and Pro A$400 on annual billing, each with included users and properties plus overages.
2. Property Inspect: InspectAI’s inputs are “photos, checklists, audio, findings.” Video and walkthroughs aren’t mentioned.
3. Property Inspect: Spoken findings are transcribed, per finding.
4. Property Inspect: “GPS & offline,” per its pricing page.
5. Property Inspect: Built on templates: it will “populate report sections automatically” and pre-fill from a property’s history.
6. Property Inspect: “Every output is linked to your inspection data and evidence”: to the photo and finding, not a moment in a walk.
7. Sully: Team plans and up draft them straight from the record.
8. Property Inspect: Templated, branded reports; white-label from Pro.
9. Sully: Any walk or project on Solo; the whole workspace on Team and up.
10. Property Inspect: “AI assistant” is marked coming soon.
11. Property Inspect: Inside Property Inspect, with client logins.
12. Property Inspect: The “full audit trail” is 30 days on Solo, 2 years on Standard, unlimited from Pro.
13. Sully: Firm plans.
14. Property Inspect: Pre-fills from a property’s history.
15. Property Inspect: “Nothing is published automatically.”
16. Sully: Drafted lines stay marked until a person verifies them.
17. Property Inspect: “Full audit trail maintained”; drafts are labelled AI.
18. Property Inspect: Regional data residency on the Enterprise plan.
19. Property Inspect: SSO/SAML on the Enterprise plan.

### Which is right for you?

Sully is built for people who visit sites they don’t own (surveyors, architects, fire-safety practitioners, inspectors, trades) and owe a client a write-up afterwards.

Property Inspect is built for “property teams managing inspections at scale”: your properties, on a schedule, with tenants and contractors in a portal.

Choose Property Inspect if you manage a portfolio, your report is a room-by-room template, and you need MRI or Yardi integrations and client logins.

Choose Sully if you visit sites you don’t manage, your evidence is a narrated walk rather than a room photographed and described, and you want the record kept on every plan.

### FAQs

**Is Sully a Property Inspect alternative?**

For a firm that visits sites rather than manages them, yes; both draft with AI and keep a person on sign-off. For a property manager running a portfolio with scheduled inspections and a tenant portal, no; that is Property Inspect’s job.

**Does InspectAI analyse video?**

Its page lists “photos, checklists, audio, findings” as inputs and describes analysing photos and transcribing spoken findings. Video and walkthroughs aren’t mentioned. We re-check the page and will update this one if that changes.

**Which is cheaper?**

They’re priced differently. Property Inspect in Australia starts at A$69 a month (Solo, annual) with per-property overages; Sully starts at A$49 a month for 25 walks, no overages. A portfolio suits their model; a firm counting walks suits ours.

### Sources checked

- [InspectAI — Property Inspect](https://propertyinspect.com/inspect-ai/)
- [Pricing (Australia) — Property Inspect](https://propertyinspect.com/au/pricing/)

### Longer reads from Sully

- [The site record appreciates](https://heysully.ai/thinking/the-site-record-appreciates)
- [Draft, not sign-ready](https://heysully.ai/thinking/draft-not-sign-ready)

---

## Sully vs a camera roll and Word

Canonical: https://heysully.ai/compare/sully-vs-camera-roll-and-word
Last checked: 31 Aug 2026 (2026-08-31)

**Verdict.** Sully is the alternative to the camera roll and Word for firms whose write-up is eating the evening: the walk comes back as a cited draft, and you still write and sign the report.

### What is a camera roll and Word?

A phone camera, a voice memo or a notebook, and Word, or the template your firm built years ago. Free, familiar, and still how most condition, building and fire-safety firms write up.

### Sully vs a camera roll and Word comparison

| Feature | Sully | a camera roll and Word |
|---|---|---|
| **Company** | | |
| Made by | Hey Sully, Australia | You, over years |
| Pricing from | A$49 a month · free trial, no card | Free, apart from the evening [1] |
| Status | Early access | Working, more or less |
| **Capture on site** | | |
| Video walkthrough | **Yes** | **Partly** [2] |
| Photos | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Talk as you go | **Yes** | **Partly** [3] |
| Works offline, hands-free | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| No platform to adopt | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| **The AI** | | |
| Reads the video together with what you said | **Yes** | **No** |
| Free-form summary, not a fixed form | **Yes** | **Yes** [4] |
| Every line cited to its frame and words | **Yes** | **No** [5] |
| Drafts the report, schedule or quote | **Yes** [6] | **No** [7] |
| Ask questions across walks and projects | **Yes** [8] | **No** |
| Lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive | **Yes** | **Yes** [9] |
| **The record** | | |
| Kept if you stop paying | **Yes** | **Yes** [10] |
| Compare baseline and post-works walks | **Yes** [11] | **Partly** [12] |
| Search by what was said on site | **Yes** | **No** [13] |
| **Trust** | | |
| The AI drafts; you review and sign | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Drafted vs verified, on the record | **Yes** [14] | **No** [15] |
| Australian data residency | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Microsoft 365 sign-in | **Yes** | **Yes** |
| Never trains models on your data | **Yes** | **Yes** |

Notes:

1. camera roll & Word: Industry figures put the write-up at about 22 minutes a report, and a 1–4 hour condition walk at 3–5 days to a finished report. Vendor-sourced and directional.
2. camera roll & Word: You can shoot it; nothing reads it.
3. camera roll & Word: A voice memo you transcribe yourself.
4. camera roll & Word: By hand.
5. camera roll & Word: “IMG_4471” isn’t a citation a client can follow.
6. Sully: Team plans and up draft them straight from the record.
7. camera roll & Word: It is the report. That’s what takes the night.
8. Sully: Any walk or project on Solo; the whole workspace on Team and up.
9. camera roll & Word: Wherever you save it.
10. camera roll & Word: Your files, in your folders.
11. Sully: Firm plans.
12. camera roll & Word: Open both folders and compare by eye.
13. camera roll & Word: Findable if the folder naming holds; unsearchable by what was said.
14. Sully: Drafted lines stay marked until a person verifies them.
15. camera roll & Word: “What was drafted, what was verified, by whom” has no answer but “me.”

### Which is right for you?

Sully is built for people who visit sites they don’t own (surveyors, architects, fire-safety practitioners, inspectors, trades) and owe a client a write-up afterwards.

The camera roll and Word are built for everyone, and scale to exactly one person’s memory: matching a hundred photos to what you saw, retyping notes, recalling calls you made on site.

Keep the old way if you do a handful of walks a month and the write-up is an hour, or every report is a fixed template of instrumented measurements. And if you don’t want another subscription, fair enough.

Choose Sully if the write-up is eating evenings or margin, the post-works walk needs diffing against the baseline, or someone will one day ask what was said about the north wall in March.

### FAQs

**Do I have to stop using Word?**

No. The draft lands in Teams, Outlook, OneDrive or Drive, and the report gets finished where it does today. Sully replaces the reconstruction before the writing, not the writing.

**What does Sully need from me on site?**

Walk as you always do and talk as you go. Video or photos, either works; video gives a richer summary. Hands-free through site noise, offline, gloves on. Nothing to fill in.

**What can’t Sully see?**

Anything that needs an instrument (crack widths, moisture, levels) and anything behind a finish. Those are your measurements and your calls. It also can’t see what you didn’t point the camera at, which is why the narration matters.

### Sources checked

- No product to check: this page describes the workflow most firms run. Industry figures are vendor-sourced and directional.

### Longer reads from Sully

- [Two hundred photos is not a record](https://heysully.ai/blog/two-hundred-photos-is-not-a-record)
- [How to narrate a site walk](https://heysully.ai/blog/how-to-narrate-a-site-walk)